THE Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) North Yorkshire viewed the plans to restore the disused reservoir at Glusburn and build an eco-friendly house within its walls with interest – Reservoir home plan likened to prison cell (Keighley News, December 29). We were highly supportive of the design, in particular the living roof. The proposal had minimal impact on the surrounding countryside, was innovative and was worthy of support. We read, with surprise, that one councillor commented the reservoir wall could be removed in the future and, if that happened, the house could have an adverse impact on the countryside. However, CPRE North Yorkshire had already addressed this issue with the planning department. To ensure the site was protected in the future, we had asked for an Article 4 Directive to be placed on the reservoir walls to ensure they remained in place. Those walls are a key part of the application site and they ensure any development on the site would not impact on the landscape. This suggestion fell on stony ground.

The application had the support of Glusburn and Cross Hills parish councils and residents. Unfortunately, their views were ignored.

The CPRE promotes the use of redundant buildings and brownfield land. Innovative design does not always please all people as design comes down to personal taste. Any design that embraces sustainability and reuses redundant or brownfield sites should be carefully considered.

This was a chance to work with builders to improve the quality of building within Craven whilst moving towards development that respects the environment. We are highly supportive of living roofs which, as already stated, reduce impact on the landscape and provide warmth. Parish councils and NGOs, such as CPRE, have a role to play in planning and could assist the council in the future, with more discussion and consultation.

J M W Marley CPRE North Yorkshire chairman CPRE Yorkshire and The Humber regional chairman