Worth Valley council no-show 'was ridiculous'

A Worth Valley parish council was initially unable to begin its September meeting, as only two councillors were present at the scheduled start time.

The chairman of Haworth, Cross Roads and Stanbury Parish Council, one other councillor and the council clerk were the only members in attendance. At least three councillors needed to be present to allow the 7.30pm meeting to conduct its civic function.

The meeting was able to go ahead shortly after 7.33pm when a third councillor arrived. A fourth councillor entered ten minutes later.

Chairman councillor John Huxley warned that the council, which is meant to have a full complement of 12 councillors, could not operate like this.

He explained to those members of the public present that the parish council had three vacant seats. This was exacerbated last Monday by two councillors being on holiday and a third being at a work-related engagement.

Coun Huxley said: “It’s worrying to me as council chairman that we’ve three vacancies and there are only four of us here tonight.

“I’m going to call for an emergency meeting of the parish council with one item on the agenda, because we can’t go on like this – it’s ridiculous.

“I know people have to go off on holiday and everyone has the right to a personal life, but we need three [more] councillors urgently to share the workload. There are lots of people in the community who say they care about this community, and if they care, they will put themselves up as councillors.”

  • Coun Huxley said he was shocked by the number of crimes committed in the parish between August 1 and September 2.

PC Eddie Irving, of the Bingley and Worth Valley Neighbourhood Policing Team (NPT), had reported that offences in this period included one alleged murder, six assaults, five non-house burglaries, seven instances of criminal damage, two thefts from motor vehicles and four other thefts.

He said there was also a case of possession of an offensive weapon and the discovery of a small cannabis factory in Cross Roads.

He noted that the police had made a significant number of arrests related to the crimes.

Coun Huxley said he was pleased with the police’s high detection rate, though added he was very surprised by the number of incidents. “Haworth is normally such a safe society and I want it to stay like that,” he said.

Speaking after the meeting, NPT sergeant Chris Watson noted that the crime rate in the area was not much different to the situation during the same month last year.

  • The council agreed to respond to safety concerns raised about Brow Road by a local resident.

Paul Hartnett said vehicles had been skidding on the steeply-sloping road and striking the wall near the junction with Victoria Road.

He said cars parked on the side of Brow Road were leaving less space for passing motorists, and that uncleared fallen leaves from a pair of trees were making the road surface treacherous during wet weather.

Mr Hartnett said he has been happy to give up his time to tidy and enhance the grass verge at the side of the road, but noted that he spends his own money on repairing the turf whenever cars mount the verge and leave marks.

Comments(14)

liontamer says...
10:50am Mon 17 Sep 12

How can it be supposed that Haworth is a safe society when it is the location of everyday robbery. Latest account :
I was in this car park today, when I saw the car park thug trying to clamp a car with a lady, her child and elderly mother on board. The lady actually lay down by the back wheel so that the clamp could not be attached. She called her husband on her phone to come to her aid. The car park thug then moved to the front wheel to try to put the clamp on. The lady then move to the front wheel. The husband then came back and pushed the car park thug away from his wife and car. At which the car park thug grabbed him and threatened him with something I could not hear.

By this time the lady had managed to get into the driving seat and start the engine. As only the back part of the clamp was in place she could have driven away, but the car park thug had called for reinforcement. This is where car park thug number 2 arrived and tried to bash in the back window. He then, unbelievably, made his own children stand behind the car so that it would deter the driver from moving. They seemed not to be a stupid as their father and got out of the way. The car and its occupants then managed to drive away.

The moral of the tale is; Don't park on this car park, as greed for money is put before the lives of children.

Little Green Man says...
3:40pm Mon 17 Sep 12

More like a classic case of Darwins theory of evolution in action, the feeble minded who can't follow simple instructions and those stupid enough to put themselves and their families in in danger will always end up being 'weeded out'

jimmy k says...
4:48pm Mon 17 Sep 12

liontamer wrote:
How can it be supposed that Haworth is a safe society when it is the location of everyday robbery. Latest account : I was in this car park today, when I saw the car park thug trying to clamp a car with a lady, her child and elderly mother on board. The lady actually lay down by the back wheel so that the clamp could not be attached. She called her husband on her phone to come to her aid. The car park thug then moved to the front wheel to try to put the clamp on. The lady then move to the front wheel. The husband then came back and pushed the car park thug away from his wife and car. At which the car park thug grabbed him and threatened him with something I could not hear. By this time the lady had managed to get into the driving seat and start the engine. As only the back part of the clamp was in place she could have driven away, but the car park thug had called for reinforcement. This is where car park thug number 2 arrived and tried to bash in the back window. He then, unbelievably, made his own children stand behind the car so that it would deter the driver from moving. They seemed not to be a stupid as their father and got out of the way. The car and its occupants then managed to drive away. The moral of the tale is; Don't park on this car park, as greed for money is put before the lives of children.
sounds like the man was lucky not be arrested for assault.but if they had not try to get something for nothing ie.pay for free parking none of the above woukld have happened.

liontamer says...
10:16am Tue 18 Sep 12

The thug should have been arrested,it's no offence to protect a woman.The car park thugs only know how to intimidate women,usually old ones at that.
To have put their own children's life at risk is the issue here anyway.
It really does sum up the perverted greedy pig minds of these vile people.
To get something for nothing is to charge someone £90(£400 if you are Dutch) for a very minor breach of totally unfair "rules". It's illegal in most of the world and will be here in 13 days time. At last. I hope that all the clampers at changegate reap what they have sewn. Word has it that some dark secrets are soon to be in the public domain.

jimmy k says...
4:39pm Tue 18 Sep 12

1,if you are the first person to lay arms on someone it is assault-fact.(i'm sure thats the same in HOLLAND)
2,it is private property and at the moment legal to clamp if they have overstayed.
3,from your account it sounds to me as if the only people who were putting anyone in danger was the couple, if they paid the fine which they owed none of this would have happened.
4,seems to me from your rather coulerful rhetteric your not exactly unbiased in all of this.

liontamer says...
10:26pm Tue 18 Sep 12

If a parent deliberately puts a 4&5 year old behind a reversing car it's plain to any normal thinking person,biased or not, that the parent is insane.I attended a public forum about this tonight and the room was unanimous in agreement on this issue.By the way to all who attended,thank you for your time and generosity,justice does take a long time sometimes,recent events prove that is the case.Haworth Against Ted Evans,be peaceful.

jimmy k says...
10:22am Wed 19 Sep 12

i see you didn't answer any of my points oh well i tried to have a reasonable debate.

liontamer says...
10:45am Wed 19 Sep 12

Please,it's ok to play devil's advocate in some debates but this is attempt double child murder we're talking about.

jimmy k says...
11:51am Wed 19 Sep 12

attempted double murder?obviously you're no lawyer however if you REALLY thought that why didfn'tyou ring the police?

liontamer says...
12:08pm Wed 19 Sep 12

The police/social services are aware I'm told.

jimmy k says...
12:23pm Wed 19 Sep 12

you're told, if you witnessed what in you're words was attempted double murder then you should have rung the police.

liontamer says...
3:38pm Wed 19 Sep 12

The you tube footage and true accounts are now all on.(The "l.o.v.e - h.a.t.e" stuff is incredible)To all from last nights meeting,ring me for the search words.No other forums will be used by myself from this point.I'm back off "daan saaf" comrades.

liontamer says...
10:24pm Wed 19 Sep 12

To clarify, first letter of the searchword on YT is in uppercase. That last "song" about latest incident cracked me up, nice one big T. Keep all links and comments for the new forum. No anger people. Slowly slowly catch a monkey.Topical about changing statements me thinks. I'm off on the boat for a week or so, will keep tuned into YT.

herbertanchovy says...
7:37pm Thu 11 Oct 12

Thanks LT, the soundcloud footage is also good. See you at next meeting, if you're up that is.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree