Graveyard home scheme shelved

The entrance to the old Oakworth Methodist cemetery The entrance to the old Oakworth Methodist cemetery

Latest plans to build a house at the entrance to an Oakworth graveyard have been shelved.

Landowner Paul Rose had wanted to locate the home, at Chapel Lane, on the same spot where the Methodist cemetery’s entrance wall and gates were demolished in 2008.

But Bradford Council has confirmed on its website’s planning section that the application had been withdrawn.

Councillor Peter Corkindale, who represents Oakworth on Keighley Town Council, said he understood this had been done at the applicant’s request.

He added: “I’m delighted that he’s withdrawn his application. The whole village was up in arms.

“But what we still have is the fact that the original entrance to the cemetery, the listed wall and gates, have not been replaced after being demolished. Bradford Council required that these be re-instated, but it still hasn’t been done.”

When phoned twice by the Keighley News for comment, Mr Rose said the phone calls amounted to harassment.

He also said that if the Keighley News contacted him again, he would report it to the police.

Opponents of the application argued that its proposed access road off Dockroyd Lane would have disturbed graves at the site.

One objector said his great grandfather was buried in the cemetery in the 1960s, so there would be legal and moral issues surrounding any move to build on burial plots.

Another local person said many of those buried in the graveyard had connections to living village residents, so it would be a disgrace to build over or remove bodies.

The plans were opposed by Keighley Town Council, which said an access road across the graveyard would be unacceptable.

Mr Rose had said the planned development would only affect the entrance to the cemetery and would not encroach on the graves.

A design statement said the new property would have been a stone-built, “family-sized” house with vehicle access from Dockroyd Lane.

Comments(2)

MorriseyRocks says...
12:51pm Thu 5 Jul 12

The demolition of the ornate wall and gate was a disgrace which has left an eyesore in the village. Let's not forget that it was the Methodist Church who sold the land looking to make a quick few quid, hardly in keeping with their principles. Why didn't they gift it to the council to look after? Mr Rose in turn took it upon himself to destroy the entrance clearly with a plan to profit from building a house. Why haven't the council enforced the order that was placed upon him to replace the wall and gates? Good on the KN for highlighting what a cowboy this man is, (his reaction to their phonecalls tells you what sort of bloke he is) and good on Cllr Corkindale for speaking his mind and making it an issue. Let's hope he (Corkindale) continues to lobby the council for the repair notice to be enforced.

legsman says...
10:11pm Mon 9 Jul 12

The reason it was withdrawn is quite simple. Mr Rose knows that if he withdraws his application he has within the year since first applying to put another application in without paying the fee again. More cynical moves from a man without a conscience.
And he's not telling the truth in saying that the graves won't be built on. They would have been putting a boundary wall and a road over about 20 graves at the top. Thankfully this potty idea has been scrapped, but only for the moment. This annoying little man won't go away so easily. It's about time Bradford Council forced him to comply with the court order and his pocket was hit hard to make him understand that he can't break the law and get away with it.
Karma, Mr Rose.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree