Housebuilder told it cannot fell 'significant' Silsden tree

The tree at Silsden <i>(Image: Persimmon)</i>
The tree at Silsden (Image: Persimmon)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

A HOUSEBUILDER’S bid to chop down a “nationally significant” tree has been blocked by Bradford Council.

Persimmon Homes had applied to fell the 22-metre-tall ash in a field off Bolton Road, Silsden – where the developer plans to build over 130 homes.

The company argued that while the tree was relatively healthy, it could get Ash Dieback in the future, and this would put residents of the new estate at risk.

But Bradford Council officers said the tree was “irreplaceable”, and refused permission to fell it, describing Persimmon’s verdict on the tree’s future to be “overly negative”.

The application by Persimmon said: “While the tree currently has no obvious symptoms of Ash Dieback, other trees at the site have symptoms of the disease and it is very likely the tree will become infected in future.”

It said that when homes, roads and footpaths were built around the tree, it would pose “an unacceptable risk”.

It added: “It is recommended to remove the tree, felling it to ground level to remove the risk posed.”

But Elizabeth McLaughlin, arboriculture officer at Bradford Council, said: “The tree is highly significant in the landscape and is visible from a number of locations.

“It contributes to the distinctive pattern of trees in the area, adding greatly to the remaining verdant character of the major development under construction.

“The tree was allowed an appropriate amount of space, with gardens and public access being located outside the crown spread in the original Persimmon layout as approved.

“It should be noted that the tree at the time of inspection was not showing signs of Ash Dieback, which could indicate that it's a resistant specimen and adds to the importance of its retention.

“It is a 'veteran tree' as captured by the Woodland Trust Ancient Tree Inventory. As such it is considered nationally significant and irreplaceable habitat.

“The layout shows that the tree will not be located directly in or over private gardens.

“It should be noted that the plan submitted to support the application is not the one which has been approved and shows a misleading picture.

“The insistence that the tree, despite showing no signs of the disease, will inevitably succumb to Ash Dieback appears to be overly negative and by no measurable means accurate.

“The evidence provided in justification is not considered to outweigh the harm that would be caused by the removal of the tree.”

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos